Saturday, December 31, 2005

Evolution Vs Intelligent Design

The federal district court ruling in Harrisburg Pa. Prohibiting intelligent design to be taught along side evolution is a purely religious decision. The religion is humanism, and its anti God stance has claimed another casualty in the war for peopleÂ’s minds. Obviously, those opposed to creationism (or intelligent design) must work extremely hard to prevent rational views from interfering with their un-provable theory. Because when a sane, rational person compares the leap of faith required for evolution against any other theory (which usually includes a designer), Darwinism always comes up lacking. The fossil record has been shown to not support evolution; there continue to be no transitional forms linking primitive species to more developed ones; and physics (law of entropy) continues to contradict the concept of getting better over time.

I would say that science is trying to use the old religious argument: DonÂ’t let them think, they might come to a different conclusion. As long as we can brainwash them, they'’ll conform to our way of thinking. May God extend his mercy to the folks in Dover Pa. Like all of us, we certainly need more of His mercy. But if Dover, and an increasing number of cities in this nation continue to spit in the face of a gracious God, I would imagine that at some point even the most patient deity would calmly wipe the expectorant off His face and quietly proclaim, “Enough”. May we be shielded by his covering WHEN that time comes!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home